We all know the story of Jesus feeding the 5000; all four gospels include it. What many do not notice is that it backfired badly and created a crisis. We explore that crisis in this two-part article.
Mark 6 tells us:
[H]is disciples came to him. “This is a remote place,” they said, “and it’s already very late. Send the people away so that they can go to the surrounding countryside and villages and buy themselves something to eat.”
But he answered, “You give them something to eat.”
They said to him, “That would take more than half a year’s wages! Are we to go and spend that much on bread and give it to them to eat?”
“How many loaves do you have?” he asked. “Go and see.” When they found out, they said, “Five—and two fish.”
Then Jesus directed them to have all the people sit down in groups on the green grass. So they sat down in groups of hundreds and fifties. Taking the five loaves and the two fish and looking up to heaven, he gave thanks and broke the loaves. Then he gave them to his disciples to distribute to the people. He also divided the two fish among them all. They all ate and were satisfied, and the disciples picked up twelve basketfuls of broken pieces of bread and fish. The number of the men who had eaten was five thousand.
Matthew and Luke repeat Mark’s story with little variation, though Matthew adds that there were women and children in addition to the 5000 men.
Is the Feeding of the 5000 an Historical Event?
Historical? I think it is because of its multiple attestations and by the significance of the event indicated by John (we will talk about this next time). While all three synoptic gospels report the event, together they are only a single attestation as Matthew and Luke simply follow Mark’s account.
John, on the other hand, serves as a second attestation since he does not show dependence on Mark but represents a separate memory of the event. There also may be a third attestation; Mark 8 (followed by Matthew 15) reports a similar occasion known as the feeding of the 4000, but it is likely a memory of the same event with a variant number of the people fed. It has very similar construction and flow to the synoptic stories of the feeding of the 5000.
Mark’s report reads:
Since they had nothing to eat, Jesus called his disciples to him and said, “I have compassion for these people; they have already been with me three days and have nothing to eat. If I send them home hungry, they will collapse on the way, because some of them have come a long distance.”
His disciples answered, “But where in this remote place can anyone get enough bread to feed them?”
“How many loaves do you have?” Jesus asked.
“Seven,” they replied.
He told the crowd to sit down on the ground. When he had taken the seven loaves and given thanks, he broke them and gave them to his disciples to distribute to the people, and they did so. They had a few small fish as well; he gave thanks for them also and told the disciples to distribute them. The people ate and were satisfied. Afterward the disciples picked up seven basketfuls of broken pieces that were left over. About four thousand were present.
This reads almost identically to the story of the feeding of the 5000 except for the numbers: 4000 instead of 5000 fed; 7 loaves instead 5; no count on the fishes; and 7 baskets of leftovers collected instead of 12.
But there is also a considerable oddity if these are different events. Mark says:
His disciples answered, “But where in this remote place can anyone get enough bread to feed them?”
Why would the disciples ask such a question after having witnessed the feeding of the 5000? Instead they would anticipate, from Jesus’ request to feed the crowd, a repeat of the earlier event. So, from these three attestations, plus John’s larger picture of its significance, I conclude that this was indeed historical.
Is the Feeding of the 5000 a Miracle?
Jesus’ feeding a multitude from scant resources was BIG! But is it a miracle? Well that depends on the definition of ‘miracle’. If a miracle is a violation of physics, then I think this is not a miracle; I don’t believe God is in the business of over-riding the way the universe works.
However, I do think Jesus did wonders others could not. He healed people, but I think he drew on natural resources we don’t understand; as writer Arthur Clarke famously observed, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” Jesus cast out demons, which I understand to be the healing of mental disorders; and he seemingly raised the dead when he likely aroused people from comas.
Jesus also did some nature miracles, like turning water into wine and walking on water, that I don’t understand at all. I don’t understand what he did or even why he did them; they seem like petty, insignificant tricks with little purpose. I wonder whether these ‘miracles’ occurred at all.
But regarding the miracle of the feeding of the 5000, I think it actually happened because of the multiple attestations and the significance John supplies to it.
How Did the Feeding of the 5000 Backfire?
The title of this article indicates that Jesus’ feeding of the 5000 backfired badly, but the synoptic gospels read as though it was very successful. The insight that the feeding of the 5000 was actually a failure—in fact a crisis—comes from the gospel of John that we will take up next time.
In this series: Insights into the Feeding of the 5000
- Yes, Jesus Fed the 5000—But it Backfired Badly!
- The Temptation of Jesus in the Book of John
- Did Satan Really Tempt Jesus in the Desert or is there Another Explanation?
- The Saddest Passage in the Bible to Me (John 666)
***
- Be sure to follow this blog in the right-hand column of this page.
- Like Jesus without Baggage Page on Facebook.
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You say: “I don’t believe God is in the business of over-riding the way the universe works.” Do you then view the Resurrection as a one-time suspension of policy?
>
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, unless it turns out that actual resurrection takes place within the physics of the Universe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A very interesting reply! Things happen today in the Universe that we are still trying to figure out – consider that will still have no theory that unifies quantum mechanics with Newtonian laws. That doesn’t mean one does not exist. The resurrection was then accomplished by way of laws of the Universe that are present, but not yet uncovered by us. I would ask you the same of the immaculate conception, but I reckon you would invoke the same logic.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Actually, Ken, my answer is not the same. Though I might be mistaken, I assume you refer to the virgin birth; the immaculate conception has to do with the birth of Mary–not Jesus.
I seriously doubt that the virgin birth of Jesus every happened. On the one hand, it does seem to have two attestations (Matthew and Luke) that seem not to be dependent on each other; but it is not mentioned anywhere in the NT outside these two birth narratives. This seems odd for such an important event.
Further, I don’t see the point or purpose of the virgin birth. And Matthew, in particular, seems to build on an OT passage that he interprets completely outside its original context and meaning. Just my opinion.
However, there HAS been research and study in the field of parthenogenesis (occasional virgin birth) in humans. So such a thing might well be a rare event within the normal physics of the Universe.
LikeLike
You are so gracious, and you are the theologian, not me! Yep, I was referring to the Virgin Birth. Right now I’m reading “The Bible Tells Me So” and it has been as liberating as your blog, in condensed form. A lot of things we THOUGHT mattered really don’t – I guess they do because if we confront alternatives we have to let go of some, uh, accumulated BAGGAGE!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ken, I am glad you are reading ‘The Bible Tells Me So’. Peter Enns is one of my favorite bloggers and book authors!
LikeLike
The late William Barclay has an interesting understanding of this miracle — he sees it as the inspiration of the crowd to share what resources many may have brought with them. Think about the mothers in the crowd — have you ever known a mother to take her children anywhere unprepared!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have also held this view of the loaves
and fishes story for many years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bob, I am familiar with this understanding; it comes up in the conversation on the feeding of the 5000 from time to time. Of course Barclay might be right, but there is no suggestion in the story itself to support it. And the response of the crowd in the gospel of John seems to indicate something very different.
By the way, I really like Barclay!
LikeLike
I think you’re right. It probably did happen. Did it happen exactly as written? Probably not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed!
LikeLike
I await Part 2.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sheila, I hope you will like it!
LikeLike
Pingback: The Temptation of Jesus in the Book of John | Jesus Without Baggage
Pingback: Did Satan Really Tempt Jesus in the Desert or is there Another Explanation? | Jesus Without Baggage
Pingback: The Saddest Passage in the Bible to Me (John 666) | Jesus Without Baggage
Pingback: 4 Views on the Significance of the Feeding of the 5000 | Jesus Without Baggage
Wrong. The feeding of the 4000 took place in s gentile region and the 5000 took place in a Jewish region. One has to understand the hebrew culture and history to understand the difference. It didnt backfire because what was revealed with the 5000 was that jesus was the new moses ushering in a new covenant. Moses + wilderness +manna + the sea = exodus, ot, covenant of law. Jesus + wilderness + bread + walking on the sea = new covenant of grace.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hotz, I think it backfired because after it was over so many people stopped following Jesus. They wanted something he wasn’t selling.
LikeLike
I don’t see it as a backfire. It got written about
and we are still talking about it 2000 years later.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ken, I don’t think it was a failure ultimately–Jesus learned something important. But I think Jesus’ insistence on he, himself, being the bread of life instead of the bread they had eaten turned people away. They wanted a rebel leader who would lead them against the Romans rather than into the kingdom of God.
LikeLike
In this thread you discuss miracles and offer plausible, rational explanations of them that don’t get sideways with natural law. I complete agree.
I also LOVE the way you boldly confront the humanity of Jesus!
In the same vein you offer that God isn’t in the business of messing with natural laws of the universe. I’ve always embraced that view.
Here’s where I get into trouble sometimes.
Humanity 100%? Check. Natural explanation of miracles? Check. Resurrection? Suspension of all of the above! We’re on a train that seems hard to get off – the proverbial slippery slope.
To be clear – I’m on the train! I’m just riding along as a passenger wondering sometimes about the track on which I’m traveling.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ken, I do believe in the resurrection of Jesus. I think Jesus met his followers after his resurrection and the fact that resurrection does not happen is rather the point. It is something new, and it spurred the Jesus movement. This is only my opinion of course.
LikeLike
I forgot all about that other discussion we had! Not trying to relitigate!! LOL. Sorry about that! Maybe the resurrection narrative is what was necessary from God’s point of view in order to set the movement in motion! Mission accomplished! I think I can latch onto that and just focus on Jesus rather than trying to know the unknowable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Where is the second part- where you discuss how it backfired?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cynthia, you will find the second part here: https://jesuswithoutbaggage.wordpress.com/2017/04/10/the-temptation-of-jesus-in-the-book-of-john/
But you can also see the links just after the article for all four posts in this series. They are all tied closely together.
LikeLike
i like cows
LikeLike